What is the philosophical impact of Pascal's wager?
Pascal's wager is a foundational philosophical argument advanced by Blaise Pascal that frames belief in God as a rational gamble with infinite potential gains or losses. The argument has had a profound impact by representing the earliest formal application of decision theory, existentialism, pragmatism, and voluntarism. However, it has also sparked extensive counter-arguments and critiques, including concerns about inauthentic belief and the problem of inconsistent revelations from competing belief systems.
What we know
- Pascal's wager is a philosophical argument advanced by mathematician and philosopher Blaise Pascal positing that individuals engage in a life-defining gamble regarding God's existence. [1, 2]
- The wager is recognized as the first formal application of decision theory, existentialism, pragmatism, and voluntarism. [2]
- Critics challenge the wager through the argument from inconsistent revelations and the problem of inauthentic belief resulting from motivation solely by potential benefits and losses. [2]
Still open
- There are ongoing critical debates regarding whether a belief adopted solely for pragmatic benefits can be considered genuine faith.
Where to go next
- whoWho was Blaise Pascal?
- the bigger pictureWhat is decision theory?
- compared withWhat is the Atheist's wager?
- how we knowWhat are the Pensées?
- an unexpected connectionWhat is Pascal's mugging?
Sources
- [1]Pascal's Wager (Wikidata Q830200) · CC0 1.0
- [2]Pascal's wager · CC BY-SA 4.0
- [3]Pascal's mugging · CC BY-SA 4.0
- [4]Atheist's wager · CC BY-SA 4.0
- [5]Blaise Pascal · CC BY-SA 4.0